Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create logical models for workflow data #5

Closed
pmanko opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 10 comments
Closed

Create logical models for workflow data #5

pmanko opened this issue Jun 4, 2021 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@pmanko
Copy link
Member

pmanko commented Jun 4, 2021

No description provided.

@pmanko
Copy link
Member Author

pmanko commented Jun 22, 2021

We should base this on a generic representation of the Lab workflow data, which can be similar to https://b-techbw.github.io/bw-lab-ig/StructureDefinition-BwLabDataDictionary.html

@pmanko pmanko added this to To do in Cycle #1 - Basic IG Jul 7, 2021
@pmanko
Copy link
Member Author

pmanko commented Jul 7, 2021

@mozzy11 this would be a useful issue to close. A full logical model would facilitate discussions about the communication.

@mozzy11
Copy link
Collaborator

mozzy11 commented Jul 7, 2021

Oh sure , let me work on this next

@mozzy11
Copy link
Collaborator

mozzy11 commented Jul 8, 2021

HI @pmanko
For the Systems to map ,
i can see you added both OpenMRS (RefApp 2.9) and Isanteplus (iSantePlus 2)
That looks to me like a dupication ,
Any reason why you added the two Systems ??

@mozzy11
Copy link
Collaborator

mozzy11 commented Jul 8, 2021

Was thinking of how to get the OpenELIS-FHIR mappings ,
but it seems OpenELIS runs a instance of HAPI-FHIR server where all the FHIR requests are forwarded.
so in this case , in the Logical model mappings , can we take the HAPI-FHIR server Data model as the OpenELIS data model ??

@pmanko
Copy link
Member Author

pmanko commented Jul 8, 2021

HI @pmanko
For the Systems to map ,
i can see you added both OpenMRS (RefApp 2.9) and Isanteplus (iSantePlus 2)
That looks to me like a dupication ,
Any reason why you added the two Systems ??

I think we can just focus on the FHIR and OpenMRS mappings currently. This would also be a good place to include mappings into OpenELIS in terms of how the concepts map directly to the OpenELIS data model, not the adjacent Hapi server.

@pmanko
Copy link
Member Author

pmanko commented Jul 8, 2021

But in general, we first need a logical model that clearly maps to the Profiles that we described - the other mappings are implementation-specific. Also, you can just put placeholders for mappings for the other systems for this issue, since #6 covers the mapping part for OpenMRS, and we can add specific issues for other systems.

@pmanko
Copy link
Member Author

pmanko commented Jul 8, 2021

HI @pmanko
For the Systems to map ,
i can see you added both OpenMRS (RefApp 2.9) and Isanteplus (iSantePlus 2)
That looks to me like a dupication ,
Any reason why you added the two Systems ??

iSantePlus represents Lab Orders using the Obs table, so the mappings would be different between the two.

@mozzy11
Copy link
Collaborator

mozzy11 commented Jul 8, 2021

Hi @pmanko ,
how should i determine the elements to include in the Logical Model mappings ??
i currently look at the OpenMRS FHIR wiki.
and only add mappings for the elements that were mapped in the FHIR2 module

@mozzy11
Copy link
Collaborator

mozzy11 commented Jul 8, 2021

WIP #15

pmanko pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
* add LogicalModel  mappings for Patient and Task resource

* add more logical models
@mozzy11 mozzy11 moved this from To do to Done in Cycle #1 - Basic IG Jul 27, 2021
@mozzy11 mozzy11 closed this as completed Jul 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants