The input contains a debate topic, an argument on the topic and a keypoint, separated by "<sep>". Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of the given topic.

[EX Q]: Topic: We should legalize cannabis<sep>Argument: Legalizing marijuana would lead to an increased incidence of marijuana addiction.<sep>Keypoint: Cannabis is a gateway-drug/addictive
[EX A]: True

[EX Q]: Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights<sep>Argument: Keeping ip laws is better for creation and innovation. if ideas and products are not protected, people have less incentive to continue creating if someone else can replicate their idea immediately.<sep>Keypoint: Intellectual property rights protect against stealing
[EX A]: False

[EX Q]: Topic: We should abolish intellectual property rights<sep>Argument: Without these protections innovation would decrease. no one would be willing to out in the time, effort and money into something that someone else could immediately rip off.<sep>Keypoint: People, or a business, own their innovations and should be able to be compensated for their endeavour
[EX A]:
True