Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default configuration value keys are wrong in README #270

Open
seansund opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #271
Open

Default configuration value keys are wrong in README #270

seansund opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #271

Comments

@seansund
Copy link
Member

seansund commented Apr 21, 2022

The README provides a table of keys that can be provided for the ibmcloud-operator-defaults ConfigMap. The keys provided in the table are wrong (at least they don't agree with the configure-operator.sh script.

Here's what is currently in the README -

Field Required Type Description
org No string The Cloud Foundry org. To list orgs, run ibmcloud account orgs.
space No string The Cloud Foundry space. To list spaces, run ibmcloud account spaces.
region No string The IBM Cloud region. To list regions, run ibmcloud regions.
resourceGroupID No string The IBM Cloud resource group ID. To list resource groups, run ibmcloud resource groups.
resourceLocation No string The location of the resource.

Here's what the configure-operator.sh script contains (and confirmed as accurate by deployment):

Field Required Type Description
org No string The Cloud Foundry org. To list orgs, run ibmcloud account orgs.
space No string The Cloud Foundry space. To list spaces, run ibmcloud account spaces.
region No string The IBM Cloud region. To list regions, run ibmcloud regions.
resourcegroupid No string The IBM Cloud resource group ID. To list resource groups, run ibmcloud resource groups.
resourcelocation No string The location of the resource.

(Notice the case of the resourcegroupid and resourcelocation values)

seansund added a commit to seansund/cloud-operators that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2022
closes IBM#270

Signed-off-by: Sean Sundberg <seansund@us.ibm.com>
@seansund seansund linked a pull request Apr 21, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant