Fixed the user query and the indexing in the mutation example.

IBM · Sep 14, 2018 · 4b26766 · 4b26766
1 parent 9a93b07
commit 4b26766
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 7 additions and 13 deletions.
diff --git a/examples/mutation/README.md b/examples/mutation/README.md
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ The mutation is the same for all users and it takes query variables to specify t
 
 ```javascript
 {
-  "id": 4,
+  "id": 3,
   "name": "Dave"
 }
 ```
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Our service will return our new user like this:
 {
   "data": {
     "add": {
-      "id": "4",
+      "id": "3",
       "name": "Dave"
     }
   }
@@ -104,6 +104,6 @@ This is a generic delete mutation.  Let's use the query variables to delete Dave
 
 ```javascript
 {
-  "id": 4
+  "id": 3
 }
 ```
diff --git a/examples/mutation/index.js b/examples/mutation/index.js
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ const users = [];
  */
 @type
 class User {
-  @context
-  context;
-
   @field(ID)
   get id() {
     return this.data.id;
@@ -47,17 +44,17 @@ class User {
  * our users array.
  */
 users.push(new User({
-  id: 1,
+  id: 0,
   name: 'alice',
 }));
 
 users.push(new User({
-  id: 2,
+  id: 1,
   name: 'bob',
 }));
 
 users.push(new User({
-  id: 3,
+  id: 2,
   name: 'carol',
 }));
 
@@ -67,13 +64,10 @@ users.push(new User({
  */
 @type
 class UserQuery {
-  @context
-  context;
-
   @field(User)
   @description('Get a specific user.')
   user(@arg(ID) id) {
-    return new User(users[id]);
+    return users[id];
   }
 
   @field([User])