Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add LlamaIndex faithfulness metric #971

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 30, 2024
Merged

add LlamaIndex faithfulness metric #971

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 30, 2024

Conversation

arielge
Copy link
Member

@arielge arielge commented Jun 30, 2024

No description provided.

@arielge arielge requested a review from perlitz June 30, 2024 14:23
@@ -2254,6 +2251,53 @@ def compute(
}


class LlamaIndexFaithfulness(LlamaIndexCorrectness):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a lot of duplicated code between the metrics. Can you please create a common base class (e.g. LlamaIndexMetric), and more the code there?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Copy link
Member

@yoavkatz yoavkatz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One change requested regarding refactoring common code - see details in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>
"""LlamaIndex based metric class for evaluating faithfulness."""

metric_name_prefix = "faithfulness"
reference_field = "contexts" # metric doesn't require reference answers
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this needed? I don't see it being used.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is a referenceless metric, this is there to prevent failures of InstanceMetric where no "references" field was provided

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(

if self.reference_field == "references":
)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the quick replies on the CR comments. I see. But a "references" are always passed in unitxt - even for reference-less metrics. How did you get a failure?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, that is a different discussion that is outside the scope of this pull request... So if you want I can remove this

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. For now, please do (it will avoid confusion).

Copy link
Member Author

@arielge arielge Jun 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. I will say on a more general note that as unitxt provides the possibility for users to use just specific parts of the library (in this case, maybe I want to use a unitxt metric without using the full unitxt pipeline), these sorts of questions might need more thought (cc @elronbandel)

src/unitxt/metrics.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>
@yoavkatz yoavkatz enabled auto-merge (squash) June 30, 2024 16:03
@yoavkatz
Copy link
Member

I approved - waiting for test to pass and auto merge.

@yoavkatz yoavkatz merged commit dfa8256 into main Jun 30, 2024
8 checks passed
@yoavkatz yoavkatz deleted the llamaindex branch June 30, 2024 17:10
gitMichal pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
* add LlamaIndex faithfulness metric

Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>

* share code between LlamaIndex metrics

Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>

* use existing 'score_prefix' field

Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>

* remove unused field

Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Ariel Gera <ariel.gera1@ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants