Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If COBOL source contains any errors functionality is lost #300

Closed
dakaa16 opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

If COBOL source contains any errors functionality is lost #300

dakaa16 opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dakaa16
Copy link

dakaa16 commented Dec 6, 2022

When an error exist in COBOL source, you are not able to see a preview when hovering over dependencies, and you are not able to inspect variables or go to declaration by using ctrl+click.
As we often experience the bug, where copybooks are seen as containing an error (#237), the features are only rarely available to us.
Having errors in the source, should not prevent me from using important features, that does not relate to said error.

Trying to see preview when hovering over copybook:
Hover

@FALLAI-Denis
Copy link

Hi,

See also #253, #203, #199, #154.

@phaumer
Copy link
Member

phaumer commented Dec 8, 2022

For some language server functions as clean parse is required, but not all, e.g. the outline view is still there. For the include files preview it should also be possible to keep that going. We will investigate.

@phaumer phaumer added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 8, 2022
@phaumer
Copy link
Member

phaumer commented Mar 10, 2023

We made some improvements for this case in v3.1.0. It will not work in all error situations, but improves editor behavior and performance for several.

@phaumer phaumer closed this as completed Mar 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants