Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update test_thermodynamic_integration #1385

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

Update test_thermodynamic_integration #1385

merged 12 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

PaulJonasJost
Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulJonasJost PaulJonasJost commented May 3, 2024

adjusted test_thermodynamic_integration, by lowering the number of chains by factor of 5 and only running 10 chains, as the comparison of more chains is not something that we should have to test imo.

In local tests (Mac) it went from ~200sek to 20

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.48%. Comparing base (d5fde03) to head (14af5f2).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1385      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    84.51%   84.48%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          157      157              
  Lines        12956    12959       +3     
===========================================
- Hits         10950    10949       -1     
- Misses        2006     2010       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dweindl dweindl requested review from arrjon and removed request for dweindl May 3, 2024 09:15
@dweindl dweindl marked this pull request as draft May 3, 2024 23:01
@dweindl dweindl changed the title Frequent Mac timeouts Update test_thermodynamic_integration May 5, 2024
@arrjon
Copy link
Contributor

arrjon commented May 6, 2024

True, this is not neceassary as a test. It was included to check convergence of the evidence estimation. Okay for me to remove it to speed up testing time.

@PaulJonasJost PaulJonasJost marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2024 07:42
@PaulJonasJost PaulJonasJost requested a review from vwiela as a code owner May 7, 2024 07:42
@vwiela vwiela merged commit 7fe40ba into develop May 16, 2024
18 checks passed
This was referenced May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants