-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Yan 678 #30
Yan 678 #30
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, other than some minor things. If I understand correctly, this is still following what we discussed last week, namely using plasma in a more "vanilla" way to demonstrate we can exchange data through it, and not necessarily trying to mimic/wrap what we are doing on the ingest pipeline + plasma_stman front.
Thats correct, this is just a demonstration and the next sprint will likely be a 'replication' of the cbf in daliuge form (is my understanding). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New small round of comments, sorry if I wasn't too clear the first time!
… then create one at random.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great now! Please go ahead with merging when convenient.
Hi Rod,
This branch is related to https://jira.skatelescope.org/browse/YAN-678. If you have time can you have a look and see it all checks out? You should be able to run the unit test independent of the others daliuge-engine/test/apps/test_plasma.py.
Cheers
Dave