Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Transfer time synchronisation scenarios into requirements (1:C.2.5 S) #150

Open
5 of 6 tasks
AnnaFeiler opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #169
Open
5 of 6 tasks

Transfer time synchronisation scenarios into requirements (1:C.2.5 S) #150

AnnaFeiler opened this issue Apr 17, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #169
Assignees
@ToddCooper
Labels
NTP Issue related to Network Time Protocol
Milestone
SDPi 1.4 review

Comments

@AnnaFeiler
Copy link
Collaborator

AnnaFeiler commented Apr 17, 2023 •
edited

In SDPi time synchronisation is a bit of an edge case, since it does not need SDC transactions to be specified. However, since we need ntp to work for all of our use cases, we have to make sure that enough content is provided for time synchronisation to work (e.g. define precision of the clock, how to handle connection loss).
@AnnaFeiler AnnaFeiler added the NTP Issue related to Network Time Protocol label Apr 17, 2023
@AnnaFeiler AnnaFeiler added this to the SDPi 1.1 Review milestone Apr 17, 2023
@AnnaFeiler AnnaFeiler added the Comment NEW A submitted comment waiting to be reviewed and dispositioned label Apr 17, 2023
@AnnaFeiler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

AnnaFeiler commented Apr 18, 2023 •
edited

@JavierEspina, @ToddCooper, @MartinKasp, @PeterKranich: I know that this is not strictly an SDC problem, but I belive it is central to making any system work properly. Please provide feedback to the linked issues as soon as possible.

@ToddCooper ToddCooper removed the Comment NEW A submitted comment waiting to be reviewed and dispositioned label May 26, 2023
@ToddCooper
Copy link
Collaborator

Added to Lübeck Discussion. May be in 1.1 or 1.2.

AnnaFeiler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 15, 2023
@AnnaFeiler
#150 Remove outdated versio note
953d852
@AnnaFeiler AnnaFeiler linked a pull request Jun 15, 2023 that will close this issue
#150 Remove outdated version note #169
Merged
2 tasks
AnnaFeiler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 15, 2023
@AnnaFeiler
#150 Remove outdated versio note
b370949
@AnnaFeiler AnnaFeiler reopened this Jun 15, 2023
AnnaFeiler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2023
@AnnaFeiler
#150 fix notes for R1520
5fdb2da
AnnaFeiler added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2023
@AnnaFeiler @d-gregorczyk
#151 add labeling requirements for ntp server configuration (#171)
97cb61c 
* #151 add labeling requirements for ntp server configuration

* Update CHANGELOG.md

Co-authored-by: David Gregorczyk <54440227+d-gregorczyk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update asciidoc/volume1/use-cases/tf1-ch-c-use-case-stad.adoc

Co-authored-by: David Gregorczyk <54440227+d-gregorczyk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update asciidoc/volume1/use-cases/tf1-ch-c-use-case-stad.adoc

Co-authored-by: David Gregorczyk <54440227+d-gregorczyk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update asciidoc/volume1/use-cases/tf1-ch-c-use-case-stad.adoc

Co-authored-by: David Gregorczyk <54440227+d-gregorczyk@users.noreply.github.com>

* #150 fix notes for R1520

---------

Co-authored-by: David Gregorczyk <54440227+d-gregorczyk@users.noreply.github.com>
@AnnaFeiler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ToddCooper: From my perspective, this can be closed. Could you double check? I'll add new, more specific ones for the results of the workshop discussions.

@AnnaFeiler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ToddCooper: Is there anything I've missed or can this be closed?

@ToddCooper ToddCooper added the Release Candidate Issue is being considered for the next release label Feb 9, 2024
@ToddCooper ToddCooper removed the Release Candidate Issue is being considered for the next release label Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ToddCooper ToddCooper

Labels
NTP Issue related to Network Time Protocol
Projects
Gemini SDPi Releases
Status: In Progress
Milestone
SDPi 1.4 review
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

#150 Remove outdated version note IHE/DEV.SDPi
2 participants
@ToddCooper @AnnaFeiler