Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ITI-66: search parameters subject vs patient #69

Closed
lynnfel opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

ITI-66: search parameters subject vs patient #69

lynnfel opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working the way intended.
Milestone

Comments

@lynnfel
Copy link
Contributor

lynnfel commented Apr 30, 2021

Section Number
https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD/ITI-66.html#message-semantics
https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/MHD/ITI-66.html#example-get

Issue
'patient' and patient.identifier are not a search parameters in this revision of ITI-66 (but they are in ITI-67). Instead, you have shown subject and subject.identifier

Your example shows patient (which is what we had in find documentmanifests).
GET test.fhir.net/R4/fhir/List?patient=9876&code=submissionset&designationType=http://loinc.org|1234-5

Proposed Change If you meant to search by subject.identifier, then update the example. When you update this, it would also be good to search by both patient id 9876 and assigning authority, setting a good example.

If you meant to enable search by patient or patient identifier, then update the list of query parameters.

Priority: medium

@lynnfel lynnfel changed the title ITI-66: error in example? ITI-66: search parameters subject vs patient Apr 30, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke self-assigned this May 5, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added the bug Something isn't working the way intended. label May 5, 2021
@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

both should be ".subject" element, and "patient" query parameter.

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added this to the 4.0.0 milestone May 5, 2021
JohnMoehrke added a commit that referenced this issue May 5, 2021
…sing #71, closing #70, closing #69, closing #65, closing #17, closing #39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working the way intended.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants