Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reference to PCC section should use sIPS extract #224

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke commented Mar 19, 2024

close #223

✅ Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed
  • I have selected a committee co-chair to review the PR

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke changed the title Update ITI-106.md reference to PCC section should use sIPS extract Mar 19, 2024
@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes there is an error thrown in the QA. This, like the existing error for MHDS, is caused by the IG publisher noticing that the link is to an IG and therefore it wants that IG to be in the dependency.

Copy link
Contributor

@lukeaduncan lukeaduncan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke merged commit 57fa6ff into master May 7, 2024
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke deleted the JohnMoehrke-reference-sIPS-PCC branch May 7, 2024 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reference to PCC should go to sIPS extract of PCC
2 participants