-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: clean duplicate test to avoid confusion #2930
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand this PR: who is a clone of who? For me the test you deleted and the link you made point on the same resources.
Besides this resource is now referenced in our contributing rules (cf #2929).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand this PR: who is a clone of who? For me the test you deleted and the link you made point on the same resources.
Besides this resource is now referenced in our contributing rules (cf #2929).
621992c
to
5c3bd8e
Compare
This PR deletes the former (and not the one from #2929) |
OK I haven't checked the module part. Right then. |
It is indeed a clone, but id does not run the test on the same module. I might did something wrong here, but the point is to enforce package declaration in spoon-bytecode in the same way it is enforce in spoon. Correct me if I am wrong but Line 29 does not apply to |
It makes sense indeed in that case. |
I propose to rename it "DecompilerArchitectureTest" |
Renamed and commented! |
This test is a clone of a test is spoon-core: https://github.com/INRIA/spoon/blob/master/src/test/java/spoon/test/architecture/SpoonArchitectureEnforcerTest.java