-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: update _episodes/01-environment.md (single file) #71
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
> and more recently [Pixi](https://github.com/prefix-dev/pixi). | ||
> These typically aim to speed up creation of environments and | ||
> resolution of dependencies, | ||
> by using faster languages – where Conda is written in Python, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't exactly true; conda uses libmamba by default now, and should be pretty close to the same speed as mamba. There shouldn't be that much reason to use mamba over conda now. micromamba, on the other hand, is a pure C++ rewrite, and is a bit faster than conda with libmamba or mamba, and is a single binary that doesn't need to bootstrap Python, so maybe just swapping "mamba" for "micromamba" would make this more accurate.
pip
and applications withpipx
Resolves: