ISO 19112 links

[ronaldtse]

From Mats:

ISO 19112 has the following links:
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/conf/srs
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/req/srs
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/conf/gaz
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/req/gaz
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/req/srs/srs
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/req/gaz/sch
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/req/gaz/mng
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/conf/srs/srs
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/conf/gaz/sch
http://standards.isotc211.org/19112/-1/2/conf/gaz/mng

I will confer with Rob on these. Since 19112 is about to be release this or next week. I am not sure if he were aiming for standards.iso.org but even then it would be in error from how those links are created.

The thing is we only have {www,def,schemas}.isotc211.org but not "standards.isotc211.org".

What do we do here?

ping @jetgeo @tedhabermann

[ronaldtse]

@jetgeo @tedhabermann what's the best course of action here?

[jetgeo]

We need to create these links. "standards.isotc211.org" is the main structure we will use for normative statements, conformance classes and conformance tests.

[ronaldtse]

Will “standards” point to “def”, “www” or “schemas”? Or is that a separate site?

[jetgeo]

Separate site :).

[ronaldtse]

Separate host name (which can be done by redirect) or separate site (different content)? 😉

[jetgeo]

Uhh... not sure. I suppose separate host name. The URLs must be resolvable, and we must be able to put content there, e.g. some kind of structured description of the statements, conformance class or test. Does that help you decide?

[ronaldtse]

Does this mean that content of "standards.isotc211.org" will differ from that of "def" "www" and "schemas"?

Given our current setup it won't really cost more but the more sites the more headaches 😉

[jetgeo]

Yes, the content is different.

• def.isotc211.org is for the ontologies
• schemas.isotc211.org is for XML schemas
• standards.isotc211.org is for normative statements and conformance
• www.isotc211.org is the main address for resources.

Did I understand your question?

[ronaldtse]

Thank you, it's the perfect answer.

So we will create the new site. Do we already have existing data to migrate to standards.isotc211.org?

[jetgeo]

I don't think we have any content yet, but the links at the top of this discussion should be resolvable, i.e. we need to have the subfolders that describe the structure.

[ronaldtse]

@jetgeo the site is up! We’ll deal with the exact content updating mechanisms later, but please help review it. Closing this for now.

https://standards.isotc211.org

[jetgeo]

Looks good for now, except that I think the example links should be resolvable. I get a 404 when I click in them.

[ronaldtse]

@jetgeo those links are not resolvable because the content is not ready? Is the content ready now?

[ronaldtse]

Already setup new issue for willing in ISO 19112 links.