Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spawn Configuration::Concurrency process managers #8269

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member

@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov commented Sep 22, 2020

... and not just one to increase checks/time.

fixes #7600
fixes #7332
closes #7744
closes #7984
closes #7425

@icinga-probot icinga-probot bot added area/checks Check execution and results bug Something isn't working labels Sep 22, 2020
@icinga-probot icinga-probot bot added this to the 2.12.1 milestone Sep 22, 2020
N-o-X
N-o-X previously approved these changes Sep 22, 2020
@N-o-X
Copy link
Contributor

N-o-X commented Sep 23, 2020

We've had a few very good benchmarks with those changes in a few test setups (#8196 (comment)), but #7984 (comment) doesn't look as expected. We'll continue testing this.

@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov marked this pull request as draft September 23, 2020 08:25
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov removed the request for review from N-o-X September 23, 2020 08:26
@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

50k checks/m

Performance seems similar to Go variant.

177f930

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 05 45

105d09c

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 05 51

a841876

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 05 57

@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

100k checks/m

Performance seems similar to Go variant.

105d09c

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 28 32

a841876

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 28 39

@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

200k checks/m

Performance seems similar to Go variant.

105d09c

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 51 43

a841876

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 12 51 53

@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

250k checks/m

105d09c

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 13 36 41

a841876

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 13 36 49

@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

300k/m

Break even.

This one

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 16 12 19

Go

Bildschirmfoto 2020-09-24 um 16 12 30

@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov changed the base branch from support/2.12 to master September 24, 2020 14:16
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov modified the milestones: 2.12.1, 2.13.0 Sep 24, 2020
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov added this to To review in v2.13.0 merge window via automation Sep 24, 2020
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Sep 24, 2020
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2020 14:20
@icinga-probot icinga-probot bot closed this Sep 24, 2020
v2.13.0 merge window automation moved this from To review to Merged Sep 24, 2020
@icinga-probot
Copy link
Contributor

icinga-probot bot commented Sep 24, 2020

Closed this issue because #8276 has been merged.

@icinga-probot icinga-probot bot removed this from the 2.13.0 milestone Sep 24, 2020
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov reopened this Sep 24, 2020
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov added this to the 2.13.0 milestone Sep 24, 2020
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov moved this from Merged to Review requested in v2.13.0 merge window Sep 24, 2020
@julianbrost julianbrost modified the milestones: 2.13.0, 2.14.0 May 31, 2021
@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

@cla-bot check

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla/signed label Aug 4, 2021
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov added this to unsorted in 42 quadrillions PRs Aug 10, 2021
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov moved this from unsorted to awaits implementation detail review in 42 quadrillions PRs Aug 10, 2021
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov moved this from awaits implementation detail review to awaits concept review (i.e. TBD) in 42 quadrillions PRs Aug 10, 2021
42 quadrillions PRs automation moved this from awaits concept review (i.e. TBD) to awaits action from OP Dec 13, 2021
@julianbrost julianbrost removed this from the 2.14.0 milestone Jan 12, 2023
@Al2Klimov
Copy link
Member Author

For the record: due to the default concurrency limits this won't blow up any box by default. It will just allow the admin to raise the limits and something happens.

@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov moved this from awaits action from OP to awaits concept review (i.e. TBD) in 42 quadrillions PRs Jan 31, 2023
@Al2Klimov Al2Klimov force-pushed the feature/procspawn-concurrency branch from 6a10405 to 895f1d9 Compare August 15, 2023 16:00
... and not just one to increase checks/time.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/checks Check execution and results cla/signed enhancement New feature or request
Projects
42 quadrillions PRs
awaits concept review (i.e. TBD)
v2.13.0 merge window
  
Review requested
3 participants