Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding secondary info for checking read and mapping quality #5

Open
bw2 opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Adding secondary info for checking read and mapping quality #5

bw2 opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bw2
Copy link

bw2 commented Jan 11, 2021

Looking at REViewer plots, I start wondering whether particular reads that contradict or support a give genotype are low quality. It might be useful if REViewer could (optionally?) draw extra info like:

  • plotting some number for each read that describes mapping quality
  • showing read pairs rather than reads
  • whether a mate or a read pair was recovered from a distant locus
  • read strand
@egor-dolzhenko
Copy link
Contributor

Great suggestions! I will put together a proposal of the changes and, if you don't mind, run it by you.

@egor-dolzhenko egor-dolzhenko added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 14, 2021
@egor-dolzhenko egor-dolzhenko self-assigned this Jan 21, 2021
@egor-dolzhenko egor-dolzhenko added this to To do in Improvements Jan 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants