Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eslint@2.5.2 breaks build 🚨 #1

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚨🚨🚨

eslint just published its new version 2.5.2, which is covered by your current version range. After updating it in your project the build went from success to failure.

This means your software is now malfunctioning, because of this update. Use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


GitHub Release

  • 1cc7f8e Docs: Remove mention of minimatch for .eslintignore (Ian VanSchooten)
  • 5bd69a9 Docs: Reorder FAQ in README (alberto)
  • 98e6bd9 Fix: Correct default for indentation in eslint --init (fixes #5698) (alberto)
  • 679095e Fix: make the default of options.cwd in runtime (fixes #5694) (Toru Nagashima)
  • 4f06f2f Docs: Distinguish examples in rules under Best Practices part 2 (Mark Pedrotti)
  • 013a18e Build: Fix bundling script (fixes #5680) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • 8c5d954 Docs: Typo fix (István Donkó)
  • 09659d6 Docs: Use string severity (Kenneth Williams)
  • a4ae769 Docs: Manual changelog update for v2.5.1 (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • c41fab9 Fix: don't use path.extname with undefined value (fixes #5678) (Myles Borins)

This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster âš¡

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6618a76 on greenkeeper-eslint-2.5.2 into b5b0bb6 on master.

@satazor satazor closed this Mar 28, 2016
@satazor satazor deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-2.5.2 branch March 28, 2016 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants