We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Although not technically incorrect, rule https://data.vlaanderen.be/shacl/DCAT-AP-VL#CatalogusShape/509740cc7b3c86ebee90dc6303c11c40e2b08212 sets the range of catalog license to an instance of dct:License. This makes validating difficult (OWA, license can be an instance without this being state.) Furthermore, the usage note restricts the license to https://data.vlaanderen.be/id/licentie/creative-commons-zero-verklaring/v1.0
I suggest to change this to a sh:hasValue rule.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
to be checked if in the additional usage notes shacl.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Although not technically incorrect, rule https://data.vlaanderen.be/shacl/DCAT-AP-VL#CatalogusShape/509740cc7b3c86ebee90dc6303c11c40e2b08212 sets the range of catalog license to an instance of dct:License.
This makes validating difficult (OWA, license can be an instance without this being state.)
Furthermore, the usage note restricts the license to https://data.vlaanderen.be/id/licentie/creative-commons-zero-verklaring/v1.0
I suggest to change this to a sh:hasValue rule.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: