-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: fixed race condition setting m_ANTSAssociate #4625
Open
seanm
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
race-call-once
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice that you found this potential race condition. 👍 I'm sorry I don't know the code either, and I find it hard to understand. 🤷 At
ITK/Modules/Registration/Metricsv4/include/itkANTSNeighborhoodCorrelationImageToImageMetricv4GetValueAndDerivativeThreader.hxx
Line 42 in 13ccff6
m_ANTSAssociateOnceFlag
apparently ensures thatm_ANTSAssociate = associate
is only executed once during the lifetime of this member variable. Which means that it cannot be reset to a different "associate" anymore, during its lifetime. Is that OK?It appears that
m_Associate
is a protected member ofDomainThreader
. It is assigned inDomainThreader::Execute
:ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkDomainThreader.hxx
Lines 54 to 57 in f408b77
So then I guess the question is: could this "threader" be executed multiple times for different "associates"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to me that a mutex (member variable)+ lock_guard variables (locally) would be more appropriate than call_once + once_flag, in this case. But again, I don't know the code either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But then again, it seems a bit "overdone" to have a separate data member (m_ANTSAssociate), just to store the result of
dynamic_cast<TNeighborhoodCorrelationMetric *>(Superclass::m_Associate)
, and then try to keep this data member up-to-date and thread-safe.I mean: apparently the (original) code tries to avoid expensive dynamic_cast's. But extra member data and mutex locking isn't for free either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
this->m_ANTSAssociate
should be change to just a function level variable with the results of the dynamic cast? This seems like it may have been an "optimization" which is not worth the complexity, with some unexpected cost?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this was done by @songgang back in 2012 in 651dcd0. Are you still around @songgang ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@seanm Looks like
m_ANTSAssociate
was actually introduced one month before songgang's commit already! Commit 9614409 authored by Michael Stauffer and committed by Hans (@hjmjohnson) has:ITK/Modules/Registration/Metricsv4/include/itkANTSNeighborhoodCorrelationImageToImageMetricv4DenseGetValueAndDerivativeThreader.h
Lines 135 to 137 in 9614409
And its commit text says:
Now I wonder if that speed gain will still be there when thread safety is taken into account 🤷 . Moreover, new compilers may yield different performance results anyway!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've looked a little more...
The string
Store the casted pointer to avoid dynamic casting in tight loops
appears 7 times, so seems, at least at one time, people thought it was a useful optimization (or got copy-pasted :))I think the answer is no. The string
m_Associate
"only" appears 108 times, and almost always it's read, not written. I can't find a setter for the ivar in fact. Only set is inDomainThreader<TDomainPartitioner, TAssociate>::Execute
.