Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete unnecessary calls to shelleyBasedEraConstraints #325

Merged

Conversation

newhoggy
Copy link
Collaborator

@newhoggy newhoggy commented Oct 19, 2023

Changelog

- description: |
    Delete unnecessary calls to `shelleyBasedEraConstraints`
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • The change log section in the PR description has been filled in
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. These may include:
    • golden tests
    • property tests
    • round trip tests
    • integration tests
      See Running tests for more details
  • The version bounds in .cabal files are updated
  • CI passes. See note on CI. The following CI checks are required:
    • Code is linted with hlint. See .github/workflows/check-hlint.yml to get the hlint version
    • Code is formatted with stylish-haskell. See .github/workflows/stylish-haskell.yml to get the stylish-haskell version
    • Code builds on Linux, MacOS and Windows for ghc-8.10.7 and ghc-9.2.7
  • Self-reviewed the diff

Copy link
Contributor

@carlhammann carlhammann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@newhoggy is there an easy criterion to remember the ShelleyBasedEraConstraints, or does one just know them eventually? I wonder how many PRs like this are still possible... Shame that -Wredundant-constraints can't pick up on this.

@newhoggy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@newhoggy is there an easy criterion to remember the ShelleyBasedEraConstraints, or does one just know them eventually? I wonder how many PRs like this are still possible... Shame that -Wredundant-constraints can't pick up on this.

There's an API design I've been thinking of that would let us drop things like shelleyBasedEraConstraints except for a thin layer around the ledger, at that point those function could even be removed from the export list.

@newhoggy newhoggy added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 19, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3ae2071 Oct 19, 2023
22 of 25 checks passed
@newhoggy newhoggy deleted the newhoggy/delete-unnecessary-calls-to-shelleyBasedEraConstraints branch October 19, 2023 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants