Adding Integer Vectors

[huhlig]

Here is a basic set. Still looking at how to template the generation easily.

[httpdigest]

Can you give a use-case that you have where those methods are currently useful for you?
Otherwise, I'd now prefer to not include methods without a use-case or where we are not quite sure of the semantics and signature, until someone asks for them.

[huhlig]

Should I clear out most of the math functions then? My specific use case for the class is for a common container class for Tile Coordinates, Vertex Indices, and Uniform Values. I don't need the math functions.

[httpdigest]

I guess so, yes. I reckon we can leave methods where the result and semantics are 100% clear, like add/sub/mul.

[huhlig]

Sounds good. Let me update.

Hans W. Uhlig - huhlig@gmail.com
PGP Key: F509CF9D892BDBE8
PGP Fingerprint: 74AF EDD7 7427 3288 45AB 6FCB F509 CF9D 892B DBE8

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Kai Burjack notifications@github.com
wrote:

I guess so, yes. I reckon we can leave methods where the result and
semantics are 100% clear, like add/sub/mul.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#71 (comment).

[httpdigest]

Yes, I agree with you. It's about time for your template system. ;)

[httpdigest]

I decided to integrate those integral component vectors in the next JOML release 1.6.8 and merged your changes. I am going to do some reformatting, though.
Would you like to be named as @author on your classes?

[huhlig]

Sure. Take a look at the code generation when you get a chance. Let me know what you think.

Hans Uhlig via Mobile | Big Data Engineer/Architect

On Jan 5, 2016, at 2:07 AM, Kai Burjack notifications@github.com wrote:

I decided to integrate those integral component vectors in the next JOML release 1.6.8 and merged your changes. I am going to do some reformatting, though.
Would you like to be named as @author on your classes?

―
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.