Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Export Format Choice GUI #88

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023
Merged

Add Export Format Choice GUI #88

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023

Conversation

JSv4
Copy link
Owner

@JSv4 JSv4 commented Mar 3, 2023

Added components to select different output formats when clicking export. Currently planning LangChain and OpenContracts format for starters. Probably makes sense to export to Spacy's document format too. Only OpenContracts is enabled at the moment, though, be warned, if you run into parsing issues importing a doc the export for the corpus containing the unparsed doc will break. Need to make the exporter more robust.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 3, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #88 (dcac18c) into main (3d7ffb5) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 46.15%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #88      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.06%   69.09%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        1862     1867       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1286     1290       +4     
- Misses        576      577       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
opencontractserver/utils/etl.py 19.65% <0.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
opencontractserver/types/enums.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
opencontractserver/users/models.py 88.07% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@JSv4 JSv4 merged commit 91fd8c1 into main Mar 3, 2023
@JSv4 JSv4 deleted the JSv4/add-export-format-choice branch March 3, 2023 06:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant