Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display files from referenced crossref in entry table (Toro520 version) #10577

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Toro520
Copy link

@Toro520 Toro520 commented Oct 25, 2023

Resolves #7731
Improves code quality of - and is based on - PR #9717

Refactor getResolvedFieldOrAlias for clarity and modern style

  • Use Stream API for better readability and concise code.
  • Simplify the logic to fetch the first resolved field or alias.
  • No change in the method's functionality or output.

Mandatory checks

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

Refactor getResolvedFieldOrAlias for clarity and modern style
- Use Stream API for better readability and concise code.
- Simplify the logic to fetch the first resolved field or alias.
- No change in the method's functionality or output.
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ plugins {
id("org.gradle.toolchains.foojay-resolver-convention") version "0.7.0"
}

rootProject.name = "JabRef"
rootProject.name = "jabRef"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not change something here, this has severe consequences for our installer infrastructure.
As the letter R is still in uppercase, I suggest this change happend by mistake.
As a general advice: Always review your own changes before committing them (use git gui or any other git tool) and only commit changes that are directly linked to your issue and are really intended.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 You can also check with "git blame" when this line was changed and go to the pull request for some background. This is a procedure for all changes in important part of the code!

We did that change at #10322, but it did not work. Changing that lead to more changes, which had unforseen consquences on macOS: #10345

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@calixtus Hi, I'm so sorry to cause this trouble, but when I first time to install it, I have this kind of issue, and I find the documentation : Changing only the case of the Gradle root project name causes exception while importing project: "java.lang.IllegalStateException: Module entity with name: untitled20.main should be available" from Pre Condition 3: Code on the local machineto solve it. It said directory and project name should be same. Right now I'm confused about it.
But now I have fixed it. I hope everything goes well.
1698276554077

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@koppor Thanks so much. Because I'm not sure is that the right way to do this(pull request), so I just tried the draft one to have a practice. You are so enthusiasm and passionate about it. I must could learn a lot from you guys.

Comment on lines +937 to +938
} catch (
IllegalArgumentException e) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please undo

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 If you have time, you can investigate the IntelliJ code style checks why this happens. It is a thing that annoys us, but we did not have found the patience to investigate.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh, I suppose I do not manipulate this 😢 . Perhaps I used the boss key ctrl + Alt + L, to organized the entire code format.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 Yes, you did. And in a "proper" IDE configuration, the code is well-formatted. We have an issue in our rules. Quick fix: Undo that change (you can do line-based stashing in git gui. Very helpful for these kind of issues). The real fix would be to fix our rules... But takes time at least 1 hour. But one learns much about IDE configuration and code style management in projects.

Comment on lines 168 to 174
public Optional<String> getResolvedFieldOrAlias(OrFields fields, BibDatabase database) {
for (Field field : fields.getFields()) {
Optional<String> value = getResolvedFieldOrAlias(field, database);
if (value.isPresent()) {
return value;
}
}
return Optional.empty();
return fields.getFields().stream()
.map(field -> getResolvedFieldOrAlias(field, database))
.filter(Optional::isPresent)
.map(Optional::get)
.findFirst();
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a side note: Although streams can under certain circumstances speed up the execution and make it more readable (so this change is ok as far as I can see), it makes it more complicated to debug, since the stacktrace is broken up by the jdk internal stream handling. @Siedlerchr should confirm this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it really depends on the context

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 Here, speed comparisons would be interesting. - I bet that the current for loop is faster - or does the compiler optimize the stream that much so that it is equal? (in the stream version, ALL elements are mapped and then filtered, then mapped and then the first is taken - not sure if there is an optimizuation for that in the JDK)

Copy link
Member

@calixtus calixtus Oct 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would not expect this. I agree, current implementation is to return as soon as a hit occurs.
Speed could be a real issue here, if we are working with a large bibfile.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. I was just curious. For training the usage of performance.

I fully agree that the change has to be reverted.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you guys, I have learnt a lot from this, and this really raise my enthusiasm to look through entire code and make the better decision next time. But right now where should I start to solve the issue #9717? I considered how to be like you guys to have the deep learning and understanding of the code and try to solve it. If at current state, first year study CS at ANU, what kind of assistance I could support. I know ,first of all, do not cause too much trouble should be the priority. 😅

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 The issue is much about code reading. The real code won't be much. -- Try to understand how the main table displays data. I think, for crossref one has to manipulate that thing so that not only the bibentry at hand, but also the cross-ref'd entry is taken into consideration.

Loom at the discussion at #7754 - there was a first attempt in that direction.

(I do not know about the code exactly. -- If, let's say, within 5 hours, you don't have any clue (you can also ask here or at that PR), consider changing the issue)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@k3KAW8Pnf7mkmdSMPHz27 Just for information: crossref is looked at by a student. Hope, it is manageable ^^

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@koppor Thanks so much. 👍

Copy link
Sponsor Member

@k3KAW8Pnf7mkmdSMPHz27 k3KAW8Pnf7mkmdSMPHz27 Oct 29, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in the stream version, ALL elements are mapped and then filtered, then mapped and then the first is taken

Intermediate operations should be lazily evaluated

Laziness-seeking. Many stream operations, such as filtering, mapping, or duplicate removal, can be implemented lazily, exposing opportunities for optimization. For example, "find the first String with three consecutive vowels" need not examine all the input strings. Stream operations are divided into intermediate (Stream-producing) operations and terminal (value- or side-effect-producing) operations. Intermediate operations are always lazy.

I would use a flatMap rather than two filtering operations, but I don't think the performance improvement is significant.

I bet that the current for loop is faster - or does the compiler optimize the stream that much so that it is equal?

I can't think of any case where a stream will be faster than a well-written for-loop. Streams are IMO well optimized, but so are for-loops. I'd vote to leave for-loops in performance-critical locations.

@k3KAW8Pnf7mkmdSMPHz27 Just for information: crossref is looked at by a student. Hope, it is manageable ^^

@koppor thank you and that is awesome! This really needs to get done. @Toro520 I as well appreciate you taking a look at it!

Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some small comments.

Comment on lines 168 to 174
public Optional<String> getResolvedFieldOrAlias(OrFields fields, BibDatabase database) {
for (Field field : fields.getFields()) {
Optional<String> value = getResolvedFieldOrAlias(field, database);
if (value.isPresent()) {
return value;
}
}
return Optional.empty();
return fields.getFields().stream()
.map(field -> getResolvedFieldOrAlias(field, database))
.filter(Optional::isPresent)
.map(Optional::get)
.findFirst();
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 Here, speed comparisons would be interesting. - I bet that the current for loop is faster - or does the compiler optimize the stream that much so that it is equal? (in the stream version, ALL elements are mapped and then filtered, then mapped and then the first is taken - not sure if there is an optimizuation for that in the JDK)

Comment on lines 160 to 167
/**
* Retrieves the first resolved field or its alias from the provided OrFields object using Stream API.
*
* @param fields The OrFields object containing a list of fields to be resolved.
* @param database The BibDatabase used for resolving the field or its alias.
* @return An Optional containing the first resolved field or alias if present,
* otherwise an empty Optional.
*/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the JavaDoc 🤩

Comment on lines +937 to +938
} catch (
IllegalArgumentException e) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Toro520 If you have time, you can investigate the IntelliJ code style checks why this happens. It is a thing that annoys us, but we did not have found the patience to investigate.

@ThiloteE ThiloteE changed the title Enhancement : The first trying of pull request to enhance code quality in issue #9717 Display files from referenced crossref in entry table (Toro520 version) Oct 28, 2023
…references to the current entry and update the relevant cells.

2. Added the addFileFromCrossref(LinkedFile file) method to add files from cross-referenced entries and update the file list.
3. Modified the removeCrossref() method to ensure that the relevant cells are updated when removing cross-references.
4. Added the updateCitationKey(String newCitationKey) method to update the citation key of cross-referenced entries and update the relevant cells.
5. Added the removeCrossrefedEntry(BibEntry crossrefedEntry) method to remove cross-referenced entries and update the relevant cells.
6. Added the updateCell() method to update the data in the cells. The specific implementation should be tailored to your code structure and requirements.
7. Added the updateFiles(List<LinkedFile> linkedFiles) method to update the file list. The specific implementation should be tailored to your code structure and requirements.
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ dependencies {

implementation 'com.fasterxml:aalto-xml:1.3.2'

implementation group: 'org.mariadb.jdbc', name: 'mariadb-java-client', version: '2.7.9'
implementation group: 'org.mariadb.jdbc', name: 'mariadb-java-client', version: '3.1.2'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not modify the gradle file!

@koppor
Copy link
Member

koppor commented Mar 11, 2024

Follow-up #10599

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Display attached files in refererenced crossref entry
6 participants