Proguard will obfuscate class names.

[kkocel]

Previous proguard example left class names unchouched.

[JakeWharton]

Wat. You have to include every annotation? Can't you wildcard it?

[kkocel]

Willcarding is root cause of #104 See @imminent comments.

[JakeWharton]

Ugh, gross. I might move this to a separate page then.
On Apr 7, 2014 12:36 AM, "Christopher Kocel" notifications@github.com
wrote:

Willcarding is root cause of #104https://github.com/JakeWharton/butterknife/issues/104See
@imminent https://github.com/imminent comments.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/117#issuecomment-39702962
.

[JakeWharton]

Proguard runs after javac so does it actually matter if these annotations are stripped?

[JakeWharton]

Ah, we need the classes to not be renamed. Grrrooooosssssssss

[JakeWharton]

Indent is different.

[JakeWharton]

You're missing focus and checked changed listeners. This isn't a very scalable solution :(

[JakeWharton]

Will -keepattributes InnerClasses work instead? Ideally we could allow obfuscation so that the generated classes are just renamed the same A + A$$ViewInjector --> a + a$$ViewInjector. I'm sure that's far too much to ask.

Ideally no one would use ProGuard...

[imminent]

@JakeWharton ideally the code would automatically and flawlessly reduce
itself to be as compact and performant as possible when compiled, but all
we have now is ProGuard.
On Apr 7, 2014 10:15 PM, "Jake Wharton" notifications@github.com wrote:

Will -keepattributes InnerClasses work instead? Ideally we could allow
obfuscation so that the generated classes are just renamed the same A +
A$$ViewInjector --> a --> a$$ViewInjector. I'm sure that's far too much
to ask.

Ideally no one would use ProGuard...

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/117#issuecomment-39812536
.

[mCloud]

index.html NOT publish to github.io? @JakeWharton

[jonreeve]

On the subject of wildcards, and not repeating for every new annotation, I found this works OK:

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
    @butterknife.* <fields>;
}

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
    @butterknife.* <methods>;
}

You might be tempted to go a step further, but this one does not work:

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
    @butterknife.* *;
}

So my full working config for ButterKnife now is this:

-keep class butterknife.** { *; }
-dontwarn butterknife.internal.**
-keep class **$$ViewInjector { *; }

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
    @butterknife.* <fields>;
}

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
    @butterknife.* <methods>;
}

Fairly short, and pretty scalable.

[JakeWharton]

Send a PR, please.

[jonreeve]

#161

[JakeWharton]

I merged #161.