Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance benchmarks? #17

Closed
brjoha opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Performance benchmarks? #17

brjoha opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@brjoha
Copy link

brjoha commented Nov 4, 2021

Hi. This looks promising.

I read the doc on performance, but am curious if you've benchmarked Jinx against other embedded languages for a handful of common computations (e.g., fibonacci sequence)?

@JamesBoer
Copy link
Owner

I've considered it, but frankly, high performance was never really a focus of Jinx. Rather, I was focused on ease of use, ease of integration, and runtime safety. For example, some quality-of-life features are directly contradictory to high performance, such as being able to reference variables by name at runtime, instead of having to figure out where they are in a virtual stack.

I'm mildly curious to see the relative performance, but honestly, not curious enough to do that extra work.

@brjoha brjoha closed this as completed Nov 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants