You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I read the doc on performance, but am curious if you've benchmarked Jinx against other embedded languages for a handful of common computations (e.g., fibonacci sequence)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've considered it, but frankly, high performance was never really a focus of Jinx. Rather, I was focused on ease of use, ease of integration, and runtime safety. For example, some quality-of-life features are directly contradictory to high performance, such as being able to reference variables by name at runtime, instead of having to figure out where they are in a virtual stack.
I'm mildly curious to see the relative performance, but honestly, not curious enough to do that extra work.
Hi. This looks promising.
I read the doc on performance, but am curious if you've benchmarked Jinx against other embedded languages for a handful of common computations (e.g., fibonacci sequence)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: