Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First draft of new cedar Lock docs. #8832

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

First draft of new cedar Lock docs. #8832

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

nynymike
Copy link
Contributor

@nynymike nynymike commented Jul 1, 2024

Prepare


Description

Target issue

#8831

Implementation Details

More docs coming but this is a start.


Test and Document the changes

  • Static code analysis has been run locally and issues have been fixed
  • Relevant unit and integration tests have been added/updated
  • Relevant documentation has been updated if any (i.e. user guides, installation and configuration guides, technical design docs etc)

@nynymike nynymike requested a review from ossdhaval July 1, 2024 20:37
Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Server-Side Request Forgery Analyzer 0 findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer 0 findings
Secrets Analyzer 0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 0 findings
SQL Injection Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings
IDOR Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Change Summary (click to expand)

The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.

Summary:

The changes in this GitHub Pull Request are primarily focused on updating the documentation for the Jans Lock system, which is a centralized authorization control plane for securing distributed applications. The changes do not introduce any direct code modifications that could impact the application's security posture.

From an application security perspective, the Jans Lock system appears to be a well-designed and security-focused approach to authorization management. Key security features include the use of a centralized policy engine, distributed policy decision points, real-time policy updates, and centralized audit and monitoring capabilities. These features can help improve the overall security of the applications using the Jans Lock system.

While the documentation changes themselves do not raise any immediate security concerns, it is essential to review the broader context of the application and ensure that the security-related aspects of the administration and configuration are thoroughly covered and accurately reflect the current state of the system.

Files Changed:

  1. docs/admin/lock/lock-master.md: This file was updated to add a new section titled "Lock Master", which appears to be documentation-related and does not introduce any obvious security concerns.

  2. docs/admin/lock/README.md: This file was updated to provide an overview of the Jans Lock system and its key security features, such as centralized authorization management, the use of the Cedar policy engine, distributed policy decision points, real-time updates and notifications, and audit and monitoring capabilities.

Powered by DryRun Security

@mo-auto mo-auto added the area-documentation Documentation needs to change as part of issue or PR label Jul 1, 2024
@mo-auto mo-auto enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2024 20:44
@mo-auto mo-auto merged commit fdea2b2 into main Jul 2, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@mo-auto mo-auto deleted the docs-mike-june-30 branch July 2, 2024 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-documentation Documentation needs to change as part of issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants