-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better webdesign #100
Comments
I'm a backend developer, but even this is too clean for me. Personally I don't like OpenUserJS.org design, so I'm eager to see what design Grease Fork is getting. There are probably a lot skilled designers active on the site, maybe it's an idea to organize a contest where the best design is implemented. |
"Barely acceptable" was what I was aiming for at the start, but yes, I think it's time for some changes. Keep in mind the design may be a bit different based on the results of https://greasyfork.org/forum/discussion/157/greasy-fork-needs-a-logo |
I need to stress this because I worry that the people I link my scripts to will have to ask me how to use the site most of the time. I need it to be more user friendly. Even if you don't do a full overhaul, just organizing things so that navigation is easier would be a tremendous help. Things I would like to see: Info / Code / Versions / Feedback: Change to buttons; maybe even a navigation bar, instead of plain links. |
…gn - make clear what the site wrote and what the author wrote, adjust install button
I've made some tweaks to the individual script pages. Feedback and suggestions welcome. |
It's a welcome improvement! |
I purposely put the install button only on the Info tab so that people could always see the main info of the script when they installed, specifically the sites affected. Yeah, Moderator Delete looks a little odd, but since it's only 4 people seeing it... |
Maybe |
Definitely an improvement! How about moving the install and the include info to the top, if it's that important? Shouldn't be too hard to fit it if that's all that's necessary. |
include info can be this long - https://greasyfork.org/scripts/995-adsfight |
Ouch. I see what you mean. |
Did you install an userscript that moves the button there, because this is not default behavior. Edit: yes you did, this is part of Greasy Fork (Firefox or Chrome)! |
Oh, did not notice that.. Thanks ^^ Edit: After commenting out line 990~999 it looks good for me now. |
That looks good; don't suppose you actually have code to do that, do you? |
Replace the "How to install" with this HTML:
Add Which requires that the |
I'm fairly happy with how an individual script's page shows, though I'm still open to suggestions. Anyone have any ideas for the script list/search results? |
Added a logo, recolored and refonted the site, tweaked the script page some more... Feedback welcome. |
I like it. I made some tweaks however, styled little bit script listing, bigger search bar and small nav align. You can use it if you want. .script-list li {
background: #EFEFEF;
border-radius: 5px;
width: 77%;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0 0 10px 0;
}
#script-search input[name="q"] {
width: 250px;
margin: 0 3px 0 0;
}
nav {
margin: 0 3px 0 0;
} |
Going to close this. For more specific suggestions, please create new tickets. |
Enough said, in its current form it's only barely acceptable.
I maybe gonna make some concepts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: