Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Smoke testing #307

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023
Merged

Smoke testing #307

merged 8 commits into from
Jun 16, 2023

Conversation

thomaspinder
Copy link
Collaborator

@thomaspinder thomaspinder commented Jun 11, 2023

Type of changes

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation / docstrings
  • Tests
  • Other

Checklist

  • I've formatted the new code by running poetry run pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure before committing.
  • [-] I've added tests for new code.
  • [-] I've added docstrings for the new code.

Description

This PR introduces a smoke test for the regression workflow facilitated by GPJax. It asserts that the predictive mean, predictive standard deviation, MLL evaluate to ground truths.

Issue Number: #303 #304 #305

@thomaspinder thomaspinder added the testing Testing label Jun 11, 2023
@thomaspinder thomaspinder added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Jun 11, 2023
@thomaspinder thomaspinder self-assigned this Jun 11, 2023
@thomaspinder thomaspinder marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2023 18:48
tests/smoke.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@st--
Copy link
Contributor

st-- commented Jun 15, 2023

very minor nit: if you actually check return values for correctness, it's not a smoke test, then it's a function integration test 😉 smoke test is just "run it and see that it doesn't blow up"...

tests/smoke.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@thomaspinder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

very minor nit: if you actually check return values for correctness, it's not a smoke test, then it's a function integration test 😉 smoke test is just "run it and see that it doesn't blow up"...

Ahh, interesting. I always thought they were one of the same. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@daniel-dodd daniel-dodd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me @thomaspinder.

@thomaspinder thomaspinder merged commit a659483 into main Jun 16, 2023
21 checks passed
@thomaspinder thomaspinder deleted the smoke_testing branch June 16, 2023 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants