Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BLE Pair-Resume #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2022
Merged

BLE Pair-Resume #69

merged 1 commit into from Feb 10, 2022

Conversation

Jc2k
Copy link
Owner

@Jc2k Jc2k commented Feb 10, 2022

The pair resume protocol can restore a session without new ECC computations, significantly speeding up re-connection time.

The pair resume protocol can restore a session without new
ECC computations, significantly speeding up re-connection time.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (dev@211b03f). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev      #69   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   74.43%           
======================================
  Files          ?       67           
  Lines          ?     5105           
  Branches       ?        0           
======================================
  Hits           ?     3800           
  Misses         ?     1305           
  Partials       ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.43% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 211b03f...7e600f9. Read the comment docs.

@Jc2k Jc2k merged commit 0b4aa62 into dev Feb 10, 2022
@Jc2k Jc2k deleted the ble-pair-resume branch February 10, 2022 07:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant