Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Variable Font italic variant issue in v2.305 #611

Open
yvvt0379 opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Variable Font italic variant issue in v2.305 #611

yvvt0379 opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@yvvt0379
Copy link

When updated to v2.305, the word "Italic" of italic variants is missing.
image

@kenmcd
Copy link

kenmcd commented Mar 30, 2023

Did you install the variable fonts?
What operating system?
What application?

@yvvt0379
Copy link
Author

  1. Yes.
  2. Windows 11.
  3. Settings.

@yvvt0379 yvvt0379 changed the title Italic variant issue in v2.305 Variable Font italic variant issue in v2.305 Mar 31, 2023
@subframe7536
Copy link

same here, is there anything update?

@jyxjjj
Copy link

jyxjjj commented Feb 28, 2024

And I think Italic should not be a single variable?
Can it be merged into upright with different name?

@subframe7536
Copy link

@jyxjjj It is impossible to make a font "variable" when some glyphs have different number of nodes in different variants

@jyxjjj
Copy link

jyxjjj commented Feb 28, 2024

@jyxjjj It is impossible to make a font "variable" when some glyphs have different number of nodes in different variants

Thank you

@kenmcd
Copy link

kenmcd commented Mar 5, 2024

Needs to be fixed in the source and the fonts regenerated.
In the font files the Roman and the Italic have different default masters - Roman default is Regular, and Italic default is Thin.
And in the source both have Thin set as the default master.
In previous versions source they are set to Regular/Italic, not Thin.
Looks like the previous version was generated using using the build tools, and this one was exported directly from Glyphs.
But this is just a guess.
Either way - v2.305 is broken.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants