Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SPARKNLP-738 Enforcing accuracy to 0 and 1 in classifiers #13901

Conversation

danilojsl
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Setting upper and lower bounds when computing accuracy

Motivation and Context

Due to anomalies in the datasets, the actual accuracy can go above 1. This confuses users and makes it look like the model results are unreliable.

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

  • Local tests

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Code improvements with no or little impact
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING page.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@danilojsl danilojsl added bug-fix DON'T MERGE Do not merge this PR labels Jul 21, 2023
@maziyarpanahi maziyarpanahi self-assigned this Aug 2, 2023
@maziyarpanahi maziyarpanahi changed the base branch from master to release/502-release-candidate August 2, 2023 13:03
@maziyarpanahi maziyarpanahi merged commit 0be91b4 into release/502-release-candidate Aug 2, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug-fix DON'T MERGE Do not merge this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants