Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ratings description to reflect changes from JoinColony/colonyNetwork#154 #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 16, 2018

Conversation

sekl
Copy link
Contributor

@sekl sekl commented Feb 16, 2018

  • changed wording in several sections to reflect using a 3 point scale instead of 5 star rating system
  • changed the list of ratings and their reputation impact
  • clarified that manager and worker now follow the same rules for reputation gain/loss from rating

Copy link
Member

@area area left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One easy change, and otherwise looks good!


In the case of the evaluator, a rating of 0-2 stars counts as them rejecting the work, and a score of 3-5 stars counts as accepting the work. Beyond that, we suggest the following guidelines for ratings:
In the case of the evaluator, a rating of 1 point counts as them rejecting the work and a score of 2-3 points counts as accepting the work. Therefore ratings and the reputation lost or gained follow these rules:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Therefore ratings and the reputation lost or gained follow these rules

The 'therefore' here implies that this is a logical consequence of the previous statement, which isn't really true. Can we change this to:

The rating received defines the reputation change the user will experience:

@area area merged commit 5222154 into JoinColony:master Feb 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants