Bump sharp 0.33

[birkskyum]

Sharp 0.33 solves a lot of issues around installation due to the postinstall script, and it brings it's own types which the Renovate PR doesn't get right.

Fixing this in imagetools, will i.e. fix a lot downstream issues of installing. Here is i.e. an example of Qwik with Deno etc.

• Support Qwik City (dev server) denoland/deno#20612

• Quick Checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines
• I have written new tests, as applicable (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• I have added a changeset, if applicable

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

• What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

• Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this
  PR?)

• Other information:

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: ea6561a

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages

Name	Type
imagetools-core	Patch
vite-imagetools	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[benmccann]

Thanks @birkskyum. I kicked off the CI and it looks like you'll have to update a few test assertions as part of this PR

[birkskyum]

Hmm, it's more than test assertions it would seem. There is this change in the heif options that imagetools need to adapt to:

• Enhancement: make compression property for heif output mandatory lovell/sharp#3740 (comment)
• https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/api-output#heif

Also the tint weight seem to have changed:.

• Improve tint luminance with weighting function lovell/sharp#3859

[birkskyum]

I've added this compression line to the format.ts, so it'll know to use av1, which was the previous default. Typescript complains a bit here, because the code doesn't do type narrowing of the outputOptions based on the value of the format.

    return image.toFormat(format, {
      compression: format == 'heif' ? 'av1' : undefined,
      quality: getQuality(config, image),
      lossless: getLossless(config, image) as boolean,
      progressive: getProgressive(config, image) as boolean
    })

[birkskyum]

Okay, I've tried to update the tests

[birkskyum]

Getting close. Rolled back a change, so the tests in the vite package are unchanged. Good chance it'll pass now on CI

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ce8a285) 93.60% compared to head (c7a0bef) 93.60%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head c7a0bef differs from pull request most recent head ea6561a. Consider uploading reports for the commit ea6561a to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #664   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.60%   93.60%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        1188     1189    +1     
  Branches      188      189    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         1112     1113    +1     
  Misses         76       76           

Flag	Coverage Δ
imagetools-core	97.01% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
vite-imagetools	78.44% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.