New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Review Model Performance #2

Closed

JoshVarty opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 0 comments

Owner

JoshVarty commented Mar 5, 2019 •

edited

Loading

30 epochs @ `slice(1e-6,1e-2))` (Cancer Normalization)

Name	Valid	Test
Resnet34	92.7	93.4
Resnet50	95.4	94.1
Resnet101	96.1	94.1
Resnet152	94.5	0.918
SqueezeNet1_1	83.3	0.8970
Densenet121	95.1	92.9

10 epochs @ `slice(1e-5,2e-2)` (ImageNet normalization)

Name	Valid	Test
Resnet50	96.9	95.8

15 epochs @ `slice(1e-6, 1e-2)` (Imagenet normalization)

Name	Valid	Test
Resnet50	97.6	94.29
Resnet101	97.7	94.87
Resnet152	97.6	95.23
Densenet121	97.6	95.19

15 epochs @ `slice(1e-6, 1e-2)` (Updated cancer normalization)

Name	Valid	Test
Resnet50	97.5	94.57
Resnet101	97.8	94.66
Resnet152	97.6	94.75
Densenet121	97.4	95.01

15 epochs @ `slice(1e-6, 1e-2)` + 5 epochs @ (1e-7, 1e-3) (Updated cancer normalization)

Name	Valid	Test
Resnet50	97.4	94.93
Resnet101	97.5	94.44
Resnet152	97.8	94.55
Densenet121	97.6	95.13

25 epochs @ `slice(1e-6, 1e-2)` (Imagnet normalization) More transformations

Name	Valid	Test
Resnet50	97.84	-
Resnet101	97.76	95.42
Resnet152	98.21	95.70
Densenet121
Densenet161

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

JoshVarty closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment