ci: do not run accessibility checks for bots

[danvk]

PR Checklist

• Addresses an existing open issue: fixes 🛠 Tooling: Don't run compliance/accessibility checks on renovate PRs #1318
• That issue was marked as status: accepting prs
• Steps in CONTRIBUTING.md were taken

Overview

See linked issue. I set this up in my repo in danvk/gravlax#58 following typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#8212. We can wait for a few renovate bot updates on my repo to confirm that this has the desired effect.

I added support for top-level if statements on jobs. It's possible to skip an individual step (which is already supported) but skipping the entire job seems more correct: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idif

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9144884) 95.89% compared to head (aa2830c) 95.89%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1319   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.89%   95.89%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines        5796     5799    +3     
  Branches      499      500    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         5558     5561    +3     
  Misses        237      237           
  Partials        1        1           

Flag	Coverage Δ
create	69.90% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
initialize	42.55% <33.33%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
migrate	69.82% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unit	76.93% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[johnnyreilly]

Wait what... You mean you don't get joy from the accessibility bot fighting the dependency bot?! 🤖🪖

[johnnyreilly]

I approve but I'll hold fire for @JoshuaKGoldberg

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

💯 thanks!

Agreed on the skipping the whole job, +1.

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Wait what... You mean you don't get joy from the accessibility bot fighting the dependency bot?! 🤖🪖

Honestly this cracks me up every time. I might leave this disabled for one or two personal smaller repos just as a test to see if any bots get into fights again. 😂

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

@all-contributors please add @danvk for infra.

🤖 Beep boop! This comment was added automatically by all-contributors-auto-action.
Not all contributions can be detected from Git & GitHub alone. Please comment any missing contribution types this bot missed.
...and of course, thank you for contributing! 💙

[allcontributors]

@JoshuaKGoldberg

We had trouble processing your request. Please try again later.

[johnnyreilly]

We had trouble processing your request. Please try again later.

Oh the irony

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

lol. if it's not that, it's all-contributors/app#468 ...

[github-actions]

🎉 This is included in version v1.57.9 🎉

The release is available on:

• GitHub releases
• npm package (@latest dist-tag)

Cheers! 📦🚀