Multi level branching with CATALOG_MIN_BRANCHES and CATALOG_MAX_BRANCHES
#319
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hello! Thanks for the features. Can you tell me how to build a project and package it in docker? I didn't manage to assemble it myself :( |
|
Hi, you do not need to build the project, use the |
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add new options
CATALOG_MIN_BRANCHESandCATALOG_MAX_BRANCHESto configure multi level branching.Default values for
CATALOG_MIN_BRANCHESandCATALOG_MAX_BRANCHESare 1 for backward compatibility.Example with default value :
Example when I add a new layer (
CATALOG_MIN_BRANCHES= 1 andCATALOG_MAX_BRANCHES= 2)Example when we disable branches (
CATALOG_MIN_BRANCHES= 0 andCATALOG_MAX_BRANCHES= 0) this one is for you @logopkFor now there are no limits in branches, so the min can be 1 and max 100 if you want but this will be unreadable.
Any thoughts @mexaniksmirnov ?
closes #293