Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement More Methods! #10

Open
8 of 10 tasks
mileslucas opened this issue Feb 27, 2020 · 7 comments
Open
8 of 10 tasks

Implement More Methods! #10

mileslucas opened this issue Feb 27, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@mileslucas
Copy link
Member

mileslucas commented Feb 27, 2020

Here are a list of dust extinction models that have been implemented somewhere else (along with their paper) that could be implemented into this repository.

@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 5, 2020

I'll go ahead and get started on F99

@icweaver icweaver mentioned this issue Jul 7, 2020
2 tasks
@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 7, 2020

Ok, just opened a PR #30! Everything looks to be working alright except for Measurements handling. I think this might be related to the package (Dierckx.jl) I am using for interpolation?

@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 7, 2020

Ok, just opened a PR #30! Everything looks to be working alright except for Measurements handling. I think this might be related to the package (Dierckx.jl) I am using for interpolation?

Solved: #30 (comment)

@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 8, 2020

Is there anything else that people would like to see in the F99 PR? If it's looking ok to everyone, I could go ahead and get started on F04 since it seems to be a natural extension of F99!

@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 8, 2020

Adding a quick todo here to track the general changes proposed for the other models that came up while working on the F99 PR:

Would it better to open this as another issue?

@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 10, 2020

Is there anything else that people would like to see in the F99 PR? If it's looking ok to everyone, I could go ahead and get started on F04 since it seems to be a natural extension of F99!

It looks like F19 is the last Fitzpatrick et al. model, so I'd be happy to close that one out too.

Just closing loose ends: F99 (#30), F04(#31), F19(#32)

This was referenced Jul 14, 2020
@icweaver
Copy link
Member

icweaver commented Jul 16, 2020

I can get started on the remaining two models if there are no objections

M14 (#33), G16(#34)

This was referenced Jul 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants