New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: MedPipe3D.jl: GPU accelerated medical image segmentation framework #127
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @jpsamaroo, @timholy it looks like you're currently assigned to review this paper 🎉. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #127 with the following error:
|
already compiled pdf is in paper folder |
👋 @timholy, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder). |
👋 @jpsamaroo, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder). |
1 similar comment
👋 @jpsamaroo, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder). |
👋 @timholy, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder). |
I just tried to get started on this, but when I clicked on the invitation, it says
I only have one GitHub account. |
@whedon assign omlins as editor |
@whedon generate pdf |
PDF failed to compile for issue #127 with the following error:
|
@jakubMitura14 did you modify something on the |
@timholy are you able to tick the boxes on the first comment of the issue? If this is the case it will be sufficient to go through with the review |
@jakubMitura14 please use the template |
Hello thanks for a tip, as I see there are some problems I had at least for that moment withdrawn the paper, still thank You! |
@jakubMitura14, in order to avoid any misunderstandings, do we understand right that you would like to withdraw this submission (in which case this issue will be closed) and potentially resubmit anew at a later time? |
Yes |
I'm sorry @omlins, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do. |
@whedon commands |
My name is now @editorialbot |
@editorialbot commands |
Hello @luraess, here are the things you can ask me to do:
|
I am thus finalising the withdrawal of the paper. |
@editorialbot withdraw |
There was a problem withdrawing the paper. |
@editorialbot reject |
There was a problem rejecting the paper. |
Closing this now manually given there are issues with the bot. |
@editorialbot reject |
Paper rejected. |
Submitting author: @jakubMitura14 (Jakub Mitura)
Repository:
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version:
Editor: @omlins
Reviewers: @jpsamaroo, @timholy
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@jpsamaroo & @timholy, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @vchuravy know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @jpsamaroo
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Paper format
paper.tex
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Content
Review checklist for @timholy
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Paper format
paper.tex
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Content
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: