Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve inference for DLMStore constructor #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2023

Conversation

timholy
Copy link
Contributor

@timholy timholy commented Jan 5, 2023

This reduces all arguments to concrete types before invoking the "real" constructor. This prevents invalidation due to novel integer types, etc.

This reduces all arguments to concrete types before invoking
the "real" constructor. This prevents invalidation due to novel
integer types, etc.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 88.29% // Head: 87.62% // Decreases project coverage by -0.66% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (e1654ba) compared to base (0e01474).
Patch coverage: 25.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #24      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.29%   87.62%   -0.67%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         393      396       +3     
==========================================
  Hits          347      347              
- Misses         46       49       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/DelimitedFiles.jl 87.62% <25.00%> (-0.67%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@KristofferC KristofferC merged commit 94336c1 into JuliaData:main Jan 5, 2023
@timholy timholy deleted the teh/invs branch January 5, 2023 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants