Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add x86 runners to CI #529

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

Add x86 runners to CI #529

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

Zentrik
Copy link
Collaborator

@Zentrik Zentrik commented Jan 7, 2024

It seems like #524 probably has existed for a long time, having CI would probably be helpful then.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (03c0c85) 0.00% compared to head (64aa86c) 0.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #529   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           9       9           
  Lines        1551    1551           
======================================
  Misses       1551    1551           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Choice on using Int64 or adapting tests to Int were based on smallness of change.
@Zentrik Zentrik changed the title Add x86 runner to TypedSyntax CI Add x86 runners to TypedSyntax CI Jan 7, 2024
I think this is the right column offset to deal with changes to fibcall function defintion. Having trouble getting things running locally.
Got it working locally.
@Zentrik Zentrik changed the title Add x86 runners to TypedSyntax CI Add x86 runners to CI Jan 7, 2024
There seems to be a weird bug on nightly, where Type{Int} doesn't get printed if `fibcall` is defined once.
@Zentrik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Zentrik commented Jan 8, 2024

I believe the nightly failures are due to JuliaLang/julia#52796.

@Zentrik Zentrik mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2024
@Zentrik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Zentrik commented Feb 5, 2024

Pretty sure the other failures are unrelated.

@Zentrik Zentrik merged commit 5411430 into JuliaDebug:master Feb 5, 2024
15 of 18 checks passed
@Zentrik Zentrik deleted the Zentrik-x86-ci branch February 5, 2024 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants