Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to pullback_function #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2021
Merged

Conversation

sethaxen
Copy link
Member

This PR makes a few improvements to pullback_function while resolving #17:

  • move the workarounds for UniformScaling and AbstractMatrix to their own utility function _dot, with checks for necessary conditions
  • swap the arguments of _dot and use gradient so we don't need to adjoint, which will be faster when there's a faster version of gradient available.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #21 (97a2489) into master (3eb3fd1) will decrease coverage by 1.27%.
The diff coverage is 30.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #21      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.53%   78.26%   -1.28%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         342      345       +3     
==========================================
- Hits          272      270       -2     
- Misses         70       75       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/AbstractDifferentiation.jl 78.26% <30.00%> (-1.28%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3eb3fd1...97a2489. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@mohamed82008 mohamed82008 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mohamed82008 mohamed82008 merged commit b4343f5 into JuliaDiff:master Oct 11, 2021
@mohamed82008
Copy link
Member

Thanks @sethaxen!

@sethaxen sethaxen deleted the vecpb branch October 11, 2021 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants