Ensure scalar_rule rules are Number typed #62
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently,
@scalar_rule
generatesrrule
methods with no type constraints. This poses a problem for rules with different definitions that have not yet been implemented. For example, the rule for matrixexponential is quite different from that for scalar exponential, but in the absence of an
rrule(::typeof(exp), ::AbstractMatrix)
method, the incorrect fallback generated by@scalar_rule
is used.To solve this,
@scalar_rule
now allows type constraints, e.g.@scalar_rule(f(x::Complex), g(x))
, and it adds explicit::Number
constraints to the generated methods if no such constraints are provided.