Update travis, appveyor

[TotalVerb]

Let's see if tests pass...

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@c96644b). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #93   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage          ?   97.8%           
========================================
  Files             ?      16           
  Lines             ?     273           
  Branches          ?       0           
========================================
  Hits              ?     267           
  Misses            ?       6           
  Partials          ?       0

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c96644b...1404408. Read the comment docs.

[yakir12]

I might be totally wrong here, but:

1. seems like you didn't include v1 in appveyor, only nightly, which failed on versioninfo, not sure why, but it's ok to let nightly fail, so you could just allow fails on nightly
2. why do you have versioninfo in there anyways? It doesn't seem to do anything.
3. finally, I recommend using this template for appveyor, then you know you got it right. Better yet, you could use skeleton.

Just some thoughts, again, I might be way off here.

[TotalVerb]

Thanks, I appreciate the help! This package is pretty old (from the 0.4 days) and we've been lagging behind on the best practices for our travis and appveyor files. Let's see if this will work.

[yakir12]

It worked!

[TotalVerb]

There is actually still a problem with the Travis code coverage after_success code which does not affect success of the test. I will try to copy over a .travis.yml that other projects are using which has working coverage.

[yakir12]

I mentioned skeleton.jl, he has a good travis template there: https://github.com/tpapp/skeleton.jl/blob/master/template/.travis.yml

[mortenpi]

You might want to consider capping Documenter here as well. See this thread on Discourse for more information.

[EricForgy]

Hope its alright. I merged this PR into #97 . If tests pass, I'll merge that one and close this one if that's alright.

[EricForgy]

Closed via #97