Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LaTeX tab substitution #21

Closed
MichaelHatherly opened this issue May 22, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

LaTeX tab substitution #21

MichaelHatherly opened this issue May 22, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@MichaelHatherly
Copy link
Contributor

@one-more-minute perhaps you've already seen JuliaLang/julia#6911, but I didn't see an issue related to it here yet. It would be great to have Unicode substitution built into Jewel's auto-completion.

@MikeInnes MikeInnes changed the title [Feature Request] LaTeX tab substitution. LaTeX tab substitution May 22, 2014
@MikeInnes
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, this will be one of the first things I do :)

@MichaelHatherly
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great, thanks.

@MikeInnes
Copy link
Contributor

Check out the master branch of the plugin and Jewel.jl and let me know what you think.

I'm still seeing some internal errors when dealing with unicode chars, but they seems to be coming from Julia's regex library – some debugging to be done there I think...

@MichaelHatherly
Copy link
Contributor Author

Works really well, thanks. Seems like it's not handling superscripts correctly though.
\^4<TAB> gives \^⁴. Though it might just be a setting in my config. I'll look into it later.

@MikeInnes
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, that's one of the current issues - I'm still relying on light table
to determine the current "thing" to replace, and it only supports a list of
allowed characters. Should be easy to fix once I get round to it.
On 13 Jun 2014 06:38, "Michael Hatherly" notifications@github.com wrote:

Works really well, thanks. Seems like it's not handling superscripts
correctly though.
^4 gives ^⁴. Though it might just be a setting in my config. I'll
look into it later.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#21 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants