[PkgEval] HDF5 may have a testing issue on Julia 0.4 (2014-09-29)

[IainNZ]

PackageEvaluator.jl is a script that runs nightly. It attempts to load all Julia packages and run their tests (if available) on both the stable version of Julia (0.3) and the nightly build of the unstable version (0.4). The results of this script are used to generate a package listing enhanced with testing results.

On Julia 0.4

• On 2014-09-28 the testing status was Tests pass.
• On 2014-09-29 the testing status changed to Tests fail, but package loads.

Tests pass. means that PackageEvaluator found the tests for your package, executed them, and they all passed.

Tests fail, but package loads. means that PackageEvaluator found the tests for your package, executed them, and they didn't pass. However, trying to load your package with using worked.

This error on Julia 0.4 is possibly due to recently merged pull request JuliaLang/julia#8420.
This issue was filed because your testing status became worse. No additional issues will be filed if your package remains in this state, and no issue will be filed if it improves. If you'd like to opt-out of these status-change messages, reply to this message saying you'd like to and @IainNZ will add an exception. If you'd like to discuss PackageEvaluator.jl please file an issue at the repository. For example, your package may be untestable on the test machine due to a dependency - an exception can be added.

Test log:

>>> 'Pkg.add("HDF5")' log
INFO: Installing BinDeps v0.3.5
INFO: Installing HDF5 v0.4.2
INFO: Installing SHA v0.0.3
INFO: Installing URIParser v0.0.3
INFO: Building HDF5
INFO: Package database updated

>>> 'using HDF5' log
Julia Version 0.4.0-dev+842
Commit e5d8c1a (2014-09-29 06:50 UTC)
Platform Info:
  System: Linux (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
  CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Sandybridge)
  LAPACK: libopenblas
  LIBM: libopenlibm
  LLVM: libLLVM-3.3

>>> test log

ERROR: InexactError()
 in h5t_set_size at /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/src/plain.jl:1811
 in datatype at /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/src/plain.jl:963
 in _d_create at /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/src/plain.jl:1367
 in _d_write at /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/src/plain.jl:1403
 in write at /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/src/plain.jl:1439
 in include at ./boot.jl:245
 in include_from_node1 at ./loading.jl:128
 in include at ./boot.jl:245
 in include_from_node1 at loading.jl:128
 in process_options at ./client.jl:285
 in _start at ./client.jl:354
 in _start_3B_3625 at /home/idunning/julia04/usr/bin/../lib/julia/sys.so
while loading /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/test/plain.jl, in expression starting on line 29
while loading /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/test/runtests.jl, in expression starting on line 4

INFO: Computing test dependencies for HDF5...
INFO: Installing ArrayViews v0.4.6
INFO: Installing DataArrays v0.2.1
INFO: Installing DataFrames v0.5.8
INFO: Installing GZip v0.2.13
INFO: Installing Reexport v0.0.1
INFO: Installing SortingAlgorithms v0.0.1
INFO: Installing StatsBase v0.6.5
INFO: Testing HDF5
================================[ ERROR: HDF5 ]=================================

failed process: Process(`/home/idunning/julia04/usr/bin/julia /home/idunning/pkgtest/.julia/v0.4/HDF5/test/runtests.jl`, ProcessExited(1)) [1]

================================================================================
INFO: Removing ArrayViews v0.4.6
INFO: Removing DataArrays v0.2.1
INFO: Removing DataFrames v0.5.8
INFO: Removing GZip v0.2.13
INFO: Removing Reexport v0.0.1
INFO: Removing SortingAlgorithms v0.0.1
INFO: Removing StatsBase v0.6.5
ERROR: HDF5 had test errors
 in error at error.jl:21
 in test at pkg/entry.jl:719
 in anonymous at pkg/dir.jl:28
 in cd at ./file.jl:20
 in cd at pkg/dir.jl:28
 in test at pkg.jl:68
 in process_options at ./client.jl:213
 in _start at ./client.jl:354
 in _start_3B_3625 at /home/idunning/julia04/usr/bin/../lib/julia/sys.so

>>> end of log

[timholy]

Thanks, @simonster!

[timholy]

Thanks for tagging, too.