fix parser

[lucaferranti]

No description provided.

[lucaferranti]

@lbenet this fixes almost all errors in the ITF1788 files (except for reverse functions). The remaining ones are not related to parsing but to the DecoratedInterval constructor and hence it might be better to address that in a separate PR (decorated intervals constructor are my immediate next step on my todo list).

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (1.0-dev@f385b7f). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             1.0-dev     #522   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   84.50%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       34           
  Lines              ?     1775           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?     1500           
  Misses             ?      275           
  Partials           ?        0           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f385b7f...b4f1120. Read the comment docs.

[lucaferranti]

ah also to note that atm the tests are not checking that warnings are thrown when they should. I would like to address warnings checks in a separate PR (after the constructors are fixed)

[lucaferranti]

last but not least, if you are wondering where the green checks come from, that's because I temporarily disabled the tests for reverse functions... we know they are failing and there's an issue in IntervalContractors.jl, so better to leave those out for the time being.

[lucaferranti]

@lbenet now ALL tests related to strings / parsing pass 🎉

FYI the only failing ITF tests (except for reverse functions)

• 8 related to constructing decorated intervals, easy to fix, PR on the way already 💪 🚀
• one related to the accurate dot product

[Kolaru]

It is great that the tests now pass =)

My comments are only about exception handling and documentation, all the rest looks good to me.

[lbenet]

Thanks @lucaferranti for addressing this! In general, LGTM, and I'm in favor of merging this.

I left few comments that are optional. Perhaps the only relevant is related to the tests, which instead of being removed could be adapted to test other numeric formats (Float32, etc).

[lucaferranti]

@lbenet now added some tests for float32 and bigfloat

[lbenet]

LGTM! Thanks a lot!

[lbenet]

Merged!

It's really nice to see again green colors in the tests!