Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace Unitful aware givensAlgorithm with a generic version. #54078
Replace Unitful aware givensAlgorithm with a generic version. #54078
Changes from all commits
9fc5f2c
04ef0f6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just noticed that this is inconsistent with the existing definition for
Float64
:It seems to be consistent with the existing definitions we would need something like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure it's worth trying to match the values of
c
ands
from the two versions translated from LAPACK. Then we'd essentially have to reimplement the version for complex numbers and I'm not sure if it necessarily works for quaternions. In any case, which of the allowed values ofc
ands
doesn't really matter. It's always the result of applying the rotation that matters and it isn't affected by this choice (except for rounding).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thought a bit more about this and concluded that you are right here. The fallback would have to make the same sign decisions as the specialized version so the approach of this PR can't work. We should probably try to make a version of the complex version that isn't restricted to
Complex32/64
.