Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make
IteratorSize(::Iterators.Cycle)
not alwaysIsInfinite
and document why #54187base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Make
IteratorSize(::Iterators.Cycle)
not alwaysIsInfinite
and document why #54187Changes from 1 commit
63f3575
7b0eba0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 90 in base/generator.jl
GitHub Actions / Check for new typos
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have other examples where
IteratorSize(it)
andIteratorSize(typeof(it))
(potentially) disagree? Makes me a bit uncomfortable.And if
it.xs
is stateful, it seems thatIsInfinite
might turn out to be wrong, becauseisempty(it.xs)
might become true.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, this is the first case, and changes the docs to suggest the possibility.
IMO that's because Iterators.cycle on stateful iterators is broken. It is explicitly documented to be infinite for non-empty arguments.