test uv_barrier_t size in right block #36
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@vtjnash now I have a doubt. you were speaking about the master branch here ? or the master branch in upstream ? |
the local uv_barrier_t implementation is used: for AIX, OpenBSD and any system not defining PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD. as the uv_barrier_t struct was modified and it isn't a pointer anymore, the check for uv_barrier_t size isn't right anymore for systems not using local uv_barrier_t implementation. so move the check inside the block implementing uv_barrier_t using pthread_barrier_t. tested on OpenBSD, where the build failed due to the STATIC_ASSERT().
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the local uv_barrier_t implementation is used: for AIX, OpenBSD and any system not defining PTHREAD_BARRIER_SERIAL_THREAD.
as the uv_barrier_t struct was modified and it isn't a pointer anymore, the check for uv_barrier_t size isn't right anymore for systems not using local uv_barrier_t implementation. so move the check inside the block implementing uv_barrier_t using pthread_barrier_t.
tested on OpenBSD, where the build failed due to the STATIC_ASSERT().
Cherry-pick #35 for the master branch.