Add Faust Dataset

[Dsantra92]

Closes #155

[Dsantra92]

The unit test is causing problems because it cannot download from UCI archives.

[Dsantra92]

@CarloLucibello should we remove the failing changes? I believe the CI downloading dataset is most likely flagged as bot download.

[CarloLucibello]

I'm not sure why we have an error with the PTBLM dataset that we didn't have before, but we can remove it from the CI tests and open a corresponding issue tracking the problem

[CarloLucibello]

I'm not sure why we have an error with the PTBLM dataset that we didn't have before, but we can remove it from the CI tests and open a corresponding issue tracking the problem

[Dsantra92]

I'm not sure why we have an error with the PTBLM dataset that we didn't have before, but we can remove it from the CI tests and open a corresponding issue tracking the problem

Cool

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #160 (eb0108d) into master (66edbf7) will decrease coverage by 1.59%.
The diff coverage is 10.34%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #160      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   33.62%   32.03%   -1.60%     
==========================================
  Files          40       42       +2     
  Lines        2028     2132     +104     
==========================================
+ Hits          682      683       +1     
- Misses       1346     1449     +103     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/datasets/meshes/faust.jl	2.17% <2.17%> (ø)
src/abstract_datasets.jl	21.87% <22.22%> (-0.71%)	⬇️
src/MLDatasets.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/datasets/text/smsspamcollection.jl	7.69% <0.00%> (-44.16%)	⬇️
src/datasets/graphs/polblogs.jl	84.21% <0.00%> (-5.27%)	⬇️
src/datasets/vision/emnist.jl	5.00% <0.00%> (-5.00%)	⬇️
src/datasets/graphs/reddit.jl	2.12% <0.00%> (-2.13%)	⬇️
src/datasets/graphs/tudataset.jl	1.36% <0.00%> (-1.37%)	⬇️
src/datasets/vision/cifar10.jl	1.20% <0.00%> (-1.21%)	⬇️
src/datasets/vision/cifar100.jl	1.20% <0.00%> (-1.21%)	⬇️
... and 4 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[CarloLucibello]

the 1.6 test failure seems real. Not sure which escape sequence is invalid on julia 1.6 though

[Dsantra92]

The problem is backslashes in lines 36-42 breaking two lines. Breaklines compatibility changed in 1.7 as understood from this discourse thread. It would be better to just use longer lines for now to let all the tests pass.

[CarloLucibello]

The problem is backslashes in lines 36-42 breaking two lines. Breaklines compatibility changed in 1.7 as understood from this discourse thread. It would be better to just use longer lines for now to let all the tests pass.

can we do this and complete this PR?

[Dsantra92]

Version Bump for this :0